Edmonton property tax data and foreign home ownership

I was quite interested to read about Calgary Property Tax Data and foreign home ownership. With the housing market across Canada going wild, the Federal Government has recently announced a ban on foreign homebuyers. I asked Edmonton Administration to pull a city inquiry similar to Calgary as to where property tax assessments are being mailed.

I remain deeply concerned about equity and affordable housing and support new measures to help provide stability and a home for all of us. I'm working with other council colleagues to explore other taxation and assessment tools to provide equity, resiliency, and stability in our climate emergency.

I’m inspired by what Mayor Stewart has accomplished in Vancouver in terms of an empty homes tax, and see that he recently proposed increasing the tax to five percent and improving compliance. (https://council.vancouver.ca/20220426/documents/b3.pdf?mc_cid=ac23ded342&mc_eid=12d1178433)

An article in the April 19 edition of the Calgary Herald provided some interesting information regarding the mailing addresses of property tax notices. It showed that of the 531,956 residential properties in Calgary, only 19,756 tax notices were sent to addresses outside city limits. 

Edmonton Administration shared that Edmonton’s tax notice distribution that shows a similar trend to Calgary. Of a total of 416,563 tax notices, 22,933 were sent outside City limits. These numbers include all properties, both residential and non-residential. 

Mailing Address Location Count Percent 

Edmonton 381,955 91.69% 

Canada 415,985 99.86% 

  • Alberta 404,888 97.20% 
  • British Columbia 6,151 1.48% 
  • All other provinces 4,946 1.19% 

Outside Canada 578 0.14% 

  • United States 423 0.10% 

TOTAL 416,563 100.0% 

As with the case of the Calgary analysis, it is important to note that mailing data are not a perfect indicator of where property owners live; however, general trends indicate that the vast majority of Edmonton property owners reside in Alberta.

From the Herald:

Data from the City of Calgary suggest foreign home ownership makes up only a tiny percentage of the overall housing stock, although exact numbers are difficult to pin down. It comes amid a red-hot local housing market and the announcement of a federal ban on foreign homebuyers.

The City of Calgary does not keep tabs on where property owners live or what their nationality is.

However, city officials were able to provide data about residential property tax assessments being mailed to an address outside the city. The information provided shows the country, U.S. state or Canadian province where the bill is being mailed.

The numbers, which are accurate up to Jan. 5 of this year, are not a perfect representation of property owners who live outside the city. For instance, a Calgary homeowner who spends the majority of the year here could choose to have their assessment sent to a winter home in Texas.

Assessments could also be going to Calgary residents who are temporarily working in another country.

The data would also not show property owners living outside the city, but choosing to have their property tax documents sent to a local property management firm.

Latest posts

As the weather turns colder, we are reminded again of the enormous cost of the social and humanitarian crisis on our streets in the richest province in Canada. As a resident of Whyte avenue, I see it everywhere around me. Just last night, a gentleman huddled in a sleeping bag in the alleyway next door.. The invisible become visible, often in transit stations, bus shelters, libraries, the remnants of public spaces.

Following my last post, (Raw Deal in the Region: Edmonton's Free Rider Problem) when you pay your property taxes, a percentage of your taxes are subsidizing the costs of the region, helping offset the taxes for property owners in the region. How much is that amount? And what do we do about it?

The City of Edmonton effectively provides various services and infrastructure projects for a Census Metropolitan Area population of 1,563,600, while only generating property tax from its resident population of 1,128,800.90. Before jumping to solutions as to how we can fairly recover costs, we need to correctly diagnose the problem.

Take action

Send a Custom Letter: Fund Public Transit
Email: